+--------------------------------------------------------------------+
| |
| PK_PD_SEQUENTIAL_2 EXAMPLE |
| |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+
This is an example for analysis of direct PD using previously esti-
mated population PK parameters. (See PK_PD_sequential_1 example).
$PROBLEM EMAX MODEL APPLIED TO EFFECT SITE CONCENTRATION
; THE DATA FILE CONTAINS *ONLY* EFFECT OBSERVATIONS,
; POP PK PARAMS ESTIMATED IN PREVIOUS RUN & FIXED HERE.
; CMT = 2 NEEDED TO TELL PREDPP TO SET F = CE
;
$DATA data
$INPUT ID TIME DV AMT=DOSE CMT
$SUBROUTINES ADVAN3
$PK
K = THETA(1)*EXP(ETA(1))
K12= .001*K ; TRIVIAL LOSS TO EFFECT COMPT.
K21= THETA(2)*EXP(ETA(2))
V1= THETA(3)*EXP(ETA(3))
EMAX=THETA(4)*EXP(ETA(4))
C50= THETA(5)*EXP(ETA(5))
S2= V1*K12/K21 ; SO THAT CESS = CPSS
$ERROR
Y= EMAX*F/(C50+F)*EXP(ERR(1))
$THETA
.124 FIXED ; K - FIXED TO PREV EST
.1 ; KEO - ESTIMATED
28.6 FIXED ; V1 - FIXED TO PREV EST
100 ; EMAX- ESTIMATED
50 ; C50 - ESTIMATED
$OMEGA
.113 FIXED ; OMEGA(K) - FIXED TO PREV EST
.04
.627 FIXED ; OMEGA(V1)- FIXED TO PREV EST
.04
.04
$SIGMA .16
; ADD $ESTIMATION, ETC, AS DESIRED.
If, moreover, an absorption lag (ALAG1) parameter is modeled in $PK
with parameters estimated from the PD data only, then this introduces
a lag in the dose - Ce relationship. Since this lag was not present
in the dose - Cp relationship, it may be interpreted as a lag in the
Cp - Ce relationship.
REFERENCES: Guide IV Section V.C.6
REFERENCES: Guide VI Section IV.B.2, VII.C.3
Go to main index.
Created by nmhelp2html v. 1.0 written by Niclas Jonsson (Modified by AJB 5/2006,11/2007,10/2012)